![]() This manuscript might be appropriate as an Empirical Article, but you should email the editor before submitting given that AMPPS rarely publishes single-lab empirical work. ![]() For single-lab empirical research addressing a more focused theoretical question or one focused on statistical or methodological issues of interst within a subfield, a more specialized journal would be a better outlet. ] AMPPS does not publish single lab empirical work that addresses substantive or theoretical questions and the journal only considers work that would be of interest to a broad audience, appealing beyond a single subfield. ] Was the study preregistered, and will all materials, data, and code be made as widely available as ethically and legally possible? ] Will all materials, data, and code used in any analyses be made as widely available as ethically and legally possible? ] Does the manuscript focus on an innovative method or analysis technique that will be of interest to and useful for readers in multiple subfields of psychology? Please see the submission guidelines for detailed instructions on submitting a Registered Report (along with examples of successful phase-1 manuscripts). The initial stage of submission for a Registered Report includes the full introduction, method section, and results section (using placeholders rather than actual outcomes). For empirical studies that have yet to begin data collection and that are not a replication study (see the RRR manuscript type for that), AMPPS strongly encourages submissions that take the form of a Registered Report. Please see the submission guidelines for details on how to submit an RRR and the details of the process for this article type. The first step for an RRR is to submit a proposal that will undergo editorial review. This manuscript might be appropriate as a Registered Replication Report (RRR). If you think your article might be appropriate despite not adhering to all of these standards for openness and transparency, please email the editor at prior before submitting your manuscript. Although AMPPS does sometimes publish Empirical Articles that lack preregistration, fully open materials, and open data, those would be exceptions that require editorial approval. Papers should be accessible and of interest to a broad range of readers. Those materials should be available to the editors and reviewers upon submission. The journal publishes empirical articles that adopt new approaches to data collection (e.g., multilab studies, adversarial collaborations, etc.) that adhere to high standards for openness and transparency, including preregistration, open materials, and available data (to the extent ethically permitted). ] This manuscript appears to be appropriate as an Empirical Article for AMPPS. ] Will this project report the results of a multi-lab replication study? ] Was the study preregistered, and will all materials, data, and code be made available to reviewers? ] Is the focus of the empirical work on research practices or meta-science issues (e.g., a survey of beliefs about making data available)? Does the manuscript present a multi-lab collaborative effort or other innovative approach to data collection (i.e., something other than a single-lab empirical paper of the sort published in most empirical journals)? ] The manuscript likely is not appropriate for AMPPS. ] Does the manuscript present new empirical work? Any AMPPS reader should be able to follow the core arguments in the main body text without fully understanding the content of any "in detail" boxes. Note that derivations, proofs, and other more technical content may conveyed through "in detail" text boxes so that readers who want to understand the issues in greater depth can do so. ] Is the main body text of the manuscript understandable by a reader who has taken no more than one or two introductory graduate statistics classes in psychology at some point in the past? The guidelines also include information about required sections and length guidelines. The submission guidelines provide more details about the types of papers we publish. We desk reject papers that fall outside of our scope or that are inappropriate for our target audience. This interactive flow chart can help you determine whether or not your manuscript is appropriate for AMPPS. ![]() AMPPS flow chart **Is my manuscript appropriate for AMPPS?**
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |